Use your own project context
Evaluate the workflow with the domain, market, and sources that matter to your team.
Turn product search into clear priorities.
Use crawl findings, keyword data, Search Console, GA4, backlinks, and competitor context to review product and category opportunities.
For ecommerce
Relevant sources
Large catalogs create more URLs and decisions than a team can review without a consistent prioritization workflow.
Technical, ranking, traffic, and link information often reaches the team through different views.
Product and category pages need a repeatable way to surface the most useful next checks.
A crawl issue is more useful when it can be reviewed alongside page and search-performance context.
Repeated spreadsheet joins slow down catalog reviews and make prioritization harder to repeat.
Connect available sources and use project-level workflows to review ecommerce search performance without unsupported automation claims.
Group the relevant page, keyword, and project context around ecommerce priorities.
Review supported search and engagement information from connected Google sources.
Inspect available site-audit findings for pages included within the plan's crawl allowance.
Compare available ranking, backlink, and visibility signals for selected competitors.
Use current product evidence and your own requirements to decide whether the workflow fits.
Evaluate the workflow with the domain, market, and sources that matter to your team.
Review timestamps, provider context, and documented availability before acting on a signal.
Use the pricing and security pages as the source of truth, and confirm custom needs in writing.
Use current project and crawl allowances to decide whether the workflow fits your catalog.
Start with the Free plan when its published allowances fit. Compare Starter and Pro on the pricing page when you need more projects, seats, keywords, crawls, or reporting eligibility.
Start on the Free plan, connect only the sources you choose, and compare the current allowances before upgrading.